Elk Grove Unified School District, et al. v. Newdow
|
Documents | Date | Link to Source Document | |
1. | Original complaint filed: The Rev. Dr. Michael A. Newdow, In Pro Per; Plaintiff, v. The Congress of the United States of America; The United States of America; William J. Clinton, President of the United States; The State of California; The Elk Grove Unified School District (“EGUSD”); David W. Gordon, Superintendent, EGUSD; The Sacramento City Unified School District (“SCUSD”); Dr. Jim Sweeney, Superintendent, SCUSD; Defendants.
|
Mar. 8, 2000 | Full Text ![]() |
2. | Decision, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Newdow v. US
|
June 26, 2002 | Full Text ![]() |
3. | Petition by US Government in support of En Banc review of 9th Circuit Court decision in Newdow v. US
|
Aug. 9, 2002 | Full Text ![]() |
4. | Brief filed before US Supreme Court by the United States as Respondent Supporting Petitioners (Elk Grove Unified School District)
|
Nov. 13, 2002 | Full Text ![]() |
5. | Reply Brief filed before US Supreme Court on behalf of The United States
|
July 2003 | Full Text ![]() |
6. | Motion for Justice Scalia‘s recusal
|
Sep. 9, 2003 | Full Text ![]() |
7. | Michael Newdow’s “Respondent’s Brief on the Merits” filed before US Supreme Court
|
Feb. 13, 2004 | Full Text ![]() |
8. | Transcripts of the oral arguments made before the Supreme Court
|
Mar. 24, 2004 | Full Text ![]() |
9. | US Supreme Court ruling
|
June 14, 2004 | Full Text ![]() |
People who view this page may also like: