Close X

DEAR READERS: is your oasis for unbiased, ad-free information on important issues. We survive on donations, averaging $22. If every reader gave $3 now, we could keep going for years. Please help.
DEAR PROCON.ORG READERS: We’re being outspent by biased organizations that use millions of dollars to misinform you. This week we’re asking our readers to help us. We survive on donations, which keep us independent and ad-free. If every one of our readers gave $3 now, the price of a cup of coffee, our fundraiser would be over. We’re a small nonprofit, but it costs a lot to keep our servers, research staff, and programs going. is your oasis on the Internet for unbiased information on important issues. If is useful to you, please take a minute to keep us online and ad-free. Thank you.

Video exploring critical thinking and how it leads to great citizen involvement

The Associated Press reported in its Jan. 5, 2005 article "'Under God' foe sues again over pledge":


"An atheist who sued because he did not want his young daughter exposed to the words 'under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance has filed another lawsuit -- this time with other parents.

Michael Newdow won his case more than two years ago before a federal appeals court, which said it was an unconstitutional blending of church and state for public school students to pledge to God.

In June, however, the Supreme Court dismissed the case, saying Newdow could not lawfully sue because he did not have custody of his elementary school-aged daughter and because the girl's mother objected to the lawsuit.

In the latest challenge filed Monday in Sacramento federal court, eight co-plaintiffs have joined the suit, and all are custodial parents or the children themselves, Newdow said. The plaintiffs' names have been withheld from the lawsuit.

'It's because of the potential adverse impacts of having your name on a case like this. That's why they are not named,' Newdow said Wednesday.

He had promised to refile when the Supreme Court dismissed his case this summer.

'I want this decided on its merits,' said Newdow, a doctor and a lawyer, who again is the attorney in the latest pledge case....

No court date has been set."
Jan. 5, 2005 Associated Press

DONATE - Donate to - DONATE
Visit the community on:
Reprinting Policy | How to Cite | Media & Press | Donate to | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Debate Topics | State Laws | History of... | Critical Thinking Quotes | Teaching Controversial Issues

© 2015, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit | 233 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200, Santa Monica, CA 90401 | Tel: 310-451-9596